Sage Intacct Lease Accounting Pricing
Sep 10, 2026
PDF, JPG, PNG, BMP, HEIC, TIFF
Upload a document to extract
Drop files here or click to upload
Up to 50 files, 50MB each
Uploading...
Sage does not publish a price for Sage Intacct Lease Accounting. The Sage Intacct documentation states that Lease Accounting is an additional subscription and directs you to contact your account manager to subscribe. There is no rate card, no per-lease figure, and no self-serve checkout. Every number you will find online comes from a reseller, a directory or another buyer, not from Sage.
That is worth knowing before you spend an afternoon looking. This page covers what Sage actually publishes, what really drives the quote, why the figures on comparison sites should be treated carefully, and what the module costs you in work even after the invoice is settled. Last updated September 2026.
What Sage publishes about Lease Accounting pricing
Exactly one sentence, in the product help: Lease Accounting is an additional subscription, and to subscribe you contact your account manager. That is the whole of it. The same documentation describes what the application does, which is enable a transition to the ASC 842 and IFRS 16 standards and let lessees manage financial and operating leases under US GAAP or IFRS. It says nothing about cost.
This puts Sage in the majority. Across eighteen lease platforms we have checked through September 2026, only a handful publish a real number. Most headline transparency and then route you to a form. Sage does not even claim transparency, which is at least consistent.
What actually drives a Sage Intacct Lease Accounting quote
Because the module is priced as an add-on to an existing Sage Intacct subscription, the quote is assembled from the same variables that drive the rest of your Sage Intacct renewal rather than from a lease-count price list.
| Variable | Why it moves the number | What to pin down before the call |
|---|---|---|
| Lease count | The standard proxy for lease accounting scope across this market | Count active leases including embedded and equipment leases, not just real estate |
| Entity count | Sage Intacct is priced heavily around entities and multi-entity consolidation | Know how many entities hold leases and whether they consolidate |
| Existing Sage Intacct footprint | An add-on to a large subscription negotiates differently from a small one | Bring your current renewal total and date to the conversation |
| Direct from Sage or through a partner | Resellers package implementation and support differently | Ask both and compare the three-year total, not the first-year price |
| Implementation and data load | Usually quoted separately from the subscription | Ask specifically whether lease data entry is included or excluded |
| Contract term | Multi-year commitments are discounted across this whole category | Price one, two and three years side by side |
Why the numbers on comparison sites are not Sage numbers
Search for Sage Intacct pricing and you will find confident per-user figures, annual minimums and module uplift ranges. Those come from resellers publishing their own guides and from directories aggregating what buyers self-report. They are not published by Sage, they are rarely dated, and they mix the core financials subscription with add-on modules in ways that are hard to unpick.
We have been burned by this pattern elsewhere and no longer repeat aggregator prices as fact. A concrete example from this same market: a directory currently lists a lease accounting product at a monthly figure that is roughly double what the vendor publishes on its own pricing page today. The vendor page is right and the directory is stale. Treat any figure you cannot trace to a vendor URL as a conversation starter, not a budget line.
What a published lease accounting price looks like, for contrast
It helps to see what transparency looks like when a vendor chooses it. iLeasePro, which has a presence in the Sage Intacct ecosystem, publishes a real ladder on its own pricing page. Verified there on 10 September 2026:
| Item | Published price |
|---|---|
| iLeaseXpress, up to 15 leases | 149 dollars per month, 15-day free trial, no setup fees |
| Portfolio Management add-on | 1,208 dollars per year |
| Document Management add-on | 1,208 dollars per year |
| Multi-factor authentication | 300 dollars per year |
| Enterprise single sign-on | 300 dollars per year |
| Two-year term | 10 percent discount |
| Three-year term | 15 percent discount |
That is not an argument that iLeasePro is the better product for you. It is an argument about what you can plan around. One of these you can budget from a web page; the other needs a meeting. If you are early in a search and need a number to take to a CFO this week, that difference matters.
The cost that does not appear on either quote
Here is the part that catches finance teams out. The Sage Intacct documentation describes the application as allowing users to capture the lease master data, after which the payment, lease liability and right-of-use schedules are calculated. Capture means a person reads the lease and types it in. The module is an engine that starts after the reading is done.
Budget four to eight analyst hours for a careful in-house abstraction of a commercial lease with its amendments. At sixty leases that is a quarter of a full-time year of work that appears on no software invoice, and it is the line item most likely to put an adoption deadline at risk. It is also the reason a subscription comparison alone will mislead you: two platforms can quote similarly and cost wildly different amounts to actually populate.
This is the gap our Sage Intacct lease abstraction workflow closes. Upload the lease and its amendments, get the commencement and expiration dates, term, base rent, escalation basis, payment frequency and option windows back as structured fields with each value cited to the page it came from, review, then export a single checked file and create the Sage Intacct lease records from it.
Is Sage Intacct Lease Accounting worth the add-on subscription?
If your leases already live in Sage Intacct entities and you want the schedules, journal entries and modifications handled inside the same chart of accounts and dimensions as everything else, yes, that integration is the point and it is hard to replicate with a bolt-on. The schedules recalculate daily and remeasurements run through a change lease process, so your close stops depending on a spreadsheet nobody wants to own.
Two caveats belong in the decision. The documentation names ASC 842 and IFRS 16 and does not name GASB 87 or GASB 96, so government and public sector reporters should confirm coverage directly rather than assume it. And it is described as an application for lessees, so if you also hold income-producing property and need lessor accounting, ask before you sign.
Does Sage Intacct Lease Accounting replace a lease administration system?
No, and that is not a criticism. It is an accounting application built to produce correct numbers. It is not built to chase a renewal notice window, flag a right of first refusal, or tell a real estate team which leases expire next quarter. Plenty of teams run the accounting in Sage Intacct and track critical dates elsewhere. One abstraction pass over the document can feed both, which is the practical argument for doing it once and doing it well.
What to ask on the quote call
Six questions, in this order. What is the annual subscription for Lease Accounting at our lease count and entity count, quoted separately from the rest of the renewal. What does implementation cost and is lease data entry included or excluded. Is there a supported bulk import path for creating lease records and what file format does it expect. Is GASB 87 or 96 on the roadmap for this application. What happens to the price if our lease count grows thirty percent. And what are the one, two and three year totals side by side.
Get the answers in writing. A lease accounting add-on renews annually and the second-year number is the one you will live with. It is the same discipline you would apply to any recurring close obligation, whether that is the lease liability rollforward or the account reconciliations that have to tie out before the books close.
Where to go next
If you are still choosing a platform rather than pricing one you already own, our comparison of ASC 842 lease accounting software covers the main options on standards coverage and pricing disclosure, and what ASC 842 lease accounting software costs looks at the category budget rather than one vendor. If Sage Intacct is already decided and the module is sitting empty, start with the abstraction.
Abstract your lease in minutes
Upload any commercial lease, PDF or scan, and get rent, escalations, options, CAM and critical dates as a clean abstract. Free to try, no signup.
Try it free now