A sale-leaseback packs two deals into one document: a sale of the property and a lease of it back to the seller, and the terms that decide the economics and the accounting are split between the purchase agreement and the lease. Upload the agreement and the leaseback, and get the rent, term, escalations, purchase price, repurchase and renewal options, and the control terms that drive the ASC 842 sale test pulled into structured fields, each citing its source page. Free to try, no demo, no minimum.
Upload a document to extract
Drop files here or click to upload
Up to 50 files
Uploading...
A sale-leaseback is one transaction documented as two: the sale of the asset and the lease back to the seller. The accounting turns on whether control of the asset actually transferred, and the terms that answer that question are scattered across both documents. Each row names the piece of the deal, where its terms live, and what the abstract must capture first.
| Deal component | Where the terms live | What the abstract must capture first |
|---|---|---|
| The sale | Purchase and sale agreement | Purchase price, closing conditions, and whether the price is at fair value |
| The leaseback This tool | The new lease | Rent, term, escalations, renewal options, and whether the lease is an operating or finance lease |
| The control terms | Both documents | Repurchase options, purchase options, and rights that may keep control with the seller |
| Off-market adjustments | Rent vs. market, price vs. fair value | Any above- or below-market rent or price that adjusts the gain and the ROU asset |
Reflects the ASC 842-40 and ASC 606 framework for sale-and-leaseback transactions; the terms that apply come from your specific documents. LeaseAbstractors extracts what the agreements say and does not make the accounting determination for you.
The economics of a sale-leaseback and its accounting depend on terms split across the purchase agreement and the lease. These are the fields the abstraction pulls out and ties back to the source.
The base rent, the lease term, the escalation schedule, and the renewal options on the leaseback, the terms that set the seller-lessee's ongoing cost and drive the ROU asset and lease liability.
The sale price, closing conditions, and any earnout or holdback, extracted so the sale side of the deal is on the record alongside the lease.
Any option for the seller to buy the asset back, the strike, and the timing, because a repurchase option is one of the terms most likely to mean control never transferred and the sale failed for accounting.
The control indicators from ASC 606 and ASC 842-40 that decide whether the transaction is a sale and leaseback or a failed sale treated as financing, surfaced so the accounting team can make the call quickly.
Rent above or below market, or a price off fair value, which adjust the gain on sale and the leaseback measurement, flagged where the documents reveal them.
Each extracted value links to the page and clause it came from across both documents, so counsel and accounting can verify a repurchase option or a rent figure in seconds.
From the purchase agreement and the leaseback to a clean, source-linked abstract that puts the sale test within reach.
Add the purchase and sale agreement, the leaseback, and any amendment or side letter. Both documents together give the full picture.
The model returns the rent, term, and escalations, the purchase price and closing terms, the repurchase and renewal options, and the control indicators as structured fields.
Each field links to its source page, so you confirm the price, the rent, and the repurchase option in minutes and hand a clean record to counsel and accounting.
Download the abstract and load it into your rent roll, ASC 842 workpapers, or lease administration system.
Last updated July 2026. What a sale-leaseback is, why the accounting hinges on control, and how abstraction pulls the terms from both documents.
Sale-leaseback abstraction is the work of reading a sale-leaseback transaction, both the purchase agreement and the lease back to the seller, and pulling the terms that decide the economics and the accounting into structured fields. That means the leaseback rent, term, escalations, and renewal options, the purchase price and closing terms, any repurchase or purchase option, and the control indicators that drive the ASC 842 sale test. It is the same discipline as any commercial lease abstraction, applied to a deal where the terms are split across two documents and a single repurchase option can change how the whole transaction is booked.
A sale-leaseback is a transaction in which the owner of a property sells it to an investor and simultaneously leases it back, so the seller keeps using the asset while converting its equity into cash. Corporations use it to free up capital tied in real estate without moving out, and net-lease investors use it to acquire a fully leased property with a known tenant on day one. The deal is documented as a purchase and sale agreement plus a new lease, and the interplay between the two, especially any repurchase right, is what makes the accounting more involved than an ordinary lease.
Under ASC 842 the first question is whether the transfer qualifies as a sale under ASC 606, which turns on whether control of the asset passes to the buyer. If it does, the seller-lessee treats it as a successful sale and leaseback: it derecognizes the asset, recognizes a gain adjusted for any off-market terms, and records a right-of-use asset and lease liability for the leaseback. If control does not transfer, it is a failed sale accounted for as a financing, the asset stays on the seller's books and the proceeds are a financial liability. Getting the sale-test terms out of both documents is the first step, and it connects directly to the rest of the ASC 842 lease data your team maintains.
A failed sale-leaseback is one where control of the asset does not transfer to the buyer, so for accounting it is not treated as a sale at all. The most common cause is a repurchase option that lets the seller buy the asset back, which generally keeps control with the seller unless the option is priced at fair value and equivalent assets are readily available. A leaseback that is effectively a finance lease can also fail the sale test. When a sale fails, the seller keeps the asset on its balance sheet and records the sale proceeds as a financial liability, so identifying the repurchase and option terms during abstraction is what lets accounting reach the right answer.
Because a sale-leaseback is usually acquired as an income stream, and the value of that income depends on terms buried in the lease: the rent and escalation schedule, the remaining term and renewal options, the credit and guaranty behind the tenant, and any repurchase right that could end the lease early. Abstracting the leaseback puts those terms on one page for underwriting, and pulling every critical date keeps a renewal or a purchase-option window from passing unnoticed after closing. The extracted fields line up with the commercial lease abstract template and run at portfolio scale through the lease abstraction software.
Still have questions? Our team is happy to help.
Talk to our teamA sale-leaseback is a transaction where a property owner sells the asset to an investor and simultaneously leases it back, keeping use of the space while converting equity into cash. It is documented as a purchase and sale agreement plus a new lease back to the seller.
The first test is whether the transfer is a sale under ASC 606, which turns on control passing to the buyer. If it is, the seller-lessee derecognizes the asset, recognizes an adjusted gain, and records a right-of-use asset and lease liability. If not, it is a failed sale treated as financing.
A failed sale-leaseback is one where control does not transfer, so it is not treated as a sale. A repurchase option is the most common cause, unless it is at fair value with equivalent assets available. The asset stays on the seller's books and the proceeds are a financial liability.
Usually yes. A repurchase option generally means the seller keeps control, so the transaction fails the sale test, unless the option is priced at the asset's fair value at exercise and equivalent alternative assets are readily available in the market.
Sellers free up capital tied in real estate without relocating, and net-lease investors acquire a fully leased property with a known tenant from day one. The value depends on the lease terms, which is why the leaseback is abstracted for underwriting.
Yes. AI reads the purchase agreement and the leaseback together and returns the rent, term, escalations, purchase price, repurchase options, and control terms as structured fields, each linked to its source page so counsel and accounting can verify them quickly.
The sale side of the same deal file.
Learn moreThe net-lease structure most sale-leasebacks use.
Learn moreWhere the sale test and leaseback measurement feed accounting.
Learn moreThe full overview of our AI lease abstraction tool.
Learn moreFrom the same family of tools
